Home >> Services >> Legal
 what is siff Save India Family (Ph: 9873540498) suggests Man Cell India
Posted on : Monday, 20 March, 2017  07:36
Location : Delhi, Delhi
Phone Number# : 9873540498
URL : http://divorcewala.com
 


what is siff Save India Family (Ph: 9873540498) suggests Man Cell India

There are various organisations working for the help of men. But the best organisation is not the one who forms the organisation by any such names but the one who really protects the interest of men who have been charged with crime they have not done i.e., malicious prosecution with malafide intent to harm the reputation of men and their reltives.
That the Respondent craves the leave of the Hon’ble Court to reserve his right to file a counter claim for the loss suffered by the Defendant/s / family / mental trauma / social stigma / loss of reputation thereon due to the false cases/ malicious prosecution/ malicious intent/ unclean hands/ fraud on court & other dowry related/ monetary/greed related/ moral turpitude related & other IPC provisions or other provisions as applicable on part of the said false complaint. That it is categorically stated that the house which has been alleged to be the matrimonial home is the self acquired property of the mother of the respondent no.1 and no person except her has any right, title or interest in it.

If any help needed then please contact:-

man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com

moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
web:- http://www.compromisewala.com

It is vehemently objected that Bangalore is the place of matrimonial home because the respondent no. 1 is settled outside India and came here only for marriage and even the petitioner & her family was aware of it and further, even the petitioner herself never stayed here after marriage as immediately after marriage she moved back to kadapa for her job when respondent no. 1 went to america to arrange for her dependent visa. And even thereafter she came to that place not for staying in any matrimonial home but instead she went at that place to board the plane to America. So if this place is said to be matrimonial home the probably all such places will come under the definition of matrimonial home where the wife visits after marriage for few days which will create utter confusion for the courts & chaos for the society.

That the petitioner is throwing illegal tantrums on respondent/husband’s entire family on the behest of her relatives/ friends / others / or for the reasons for her oblique motives & hence this is an immature act of the complaint & as well explained by upper courts that an immature person has no right to approach the court of law because each one is liable to be punished for its action when in courts hence the petition of the petitioner is not maintainable in the eyes of law.

Due to the reasons & documents & evidences mentioned within these PO and within WS it can be seen that there is no cause of action arising out of the current petition & prima facie no case is made out. Hence, respondent no. 1 vehemently raise objection in respect thereof.

That r/w the case of T. Arivandandam vs T. V. Satyapal & Another on 14 October, 1977 Equivalent citations: 1977 AIR 2421, 1978 SCR (1) 742Bench: Krishnaiyer, V.R. Civil Procedure Code (Act V. 1908), section 35A, Order VII, rule 11 and 10-Duties of the court in curbing frivolous and vexatious cases. The trial court in this case will remind itself of s. 35-A C.P.C. and take deterrent action if it is satisfied that the litigation was inspired by vexatious motives and altogether groundless. The learned Munsif must remember that if on a meaningful-not formal-reading of the plaint it is manifestly vexatious, and meritless, in the sense of not disclosing a clear right to sue, be should exercise his power under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. taking care to see that the ground mentioned therein is fulfilled. And, if clever, drafting has created the illusion of a cause of action, nip it in the bud at the first hearing by examining the party searchingly under Order X C.P.C. An activist Judge is the answer to irresponsible law suits. Hence, this Hon’ble Court is duty bound to nip it in the bud i.e., close this present complaint r/w the above judgment.

As per Delhi HC if DIR is available then it must be taken into consideration before passing an order. But respondent no. 1 is unable to understand telugu/ other language in which DIR has been prepared hence, my defense rights may kindly be restored and I may kindly be provided translated copy of DIR if even after perusal of other preliminary objections this plaint is found to be worth proceeding further by this Hon’ble Court.

Best Wishes & Happy Fighting false cases & SOCIAL STIGMA on you & family!!!.

If any help needed then please contact:-

man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com

moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
web:- http://divorcewala.com


 
  
  In this Ad : Offering a service
  Posted By: A Business/Professional
  It is NOT ok to contact this poster with commercial interests.



Home Browse Cities Sitemap Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Unolist LLC. All rights reserved.